plays Lebanese Poker against Hezbollah and Syria's Bashar Assad; See, raise and call-- 15,000 to
50,000 to 500,000 to 800,000.
How did the Lebanese respond to the Syrian/Hezbollah demonstration amassing 500,000 people in
response the initial
anti-Syrian demonstration of approximately 50,000? They
responded with an anti-Syrian demonstration of 800,000 people.
Who knows how many of those participating in the pro-Syrian demonstration were sincerely pro-Syrian
and how many were about as sincere as the crowds orchestrated by Saddam Hussein before he was
toppled. Given the dependence of Hezbollah upon Syria and Iran, one has to suspect that a
significant portion of those 500,000 participated out of fear or for pecuniary motives, but there
can be little doubt that at least several hundred thousand of those people are either sympathetic
to, or fanatical supporters of, Hezbollah. That's rather depressing.
In contrast, however, the subsequent anti-Syrian demonstration by 800,000 rekindled the hopes that
the massive pro-Syrian demonstration attempted to extinguish. There can be little doubt that
all but a tiny percentage of those demonstrators were motivated by factors other than a desire for
Syria to cease its de-facto rule of Lebanon.
This is high-stakes poker, and neither the 800,00 nor at least several hundred thousand among the
500,000 are bluffing. Sounds like the formula for a civil war. Such were the fears in
the Ukraine, where, fortunately, civil war has not erupted. However, Lebanon has a long
history of civil war. That many of the factions that were at war with one another are now
united in their opposition to Syrian control is encouraging, but the fact that the Hezbollah and the
Syrians can mount such a large pro-Syria demonstration is troubling indeed.
What choices do civilized people have when confronted with fanatical terrorists in their
midst? What choices do cancer patients have? Is it better to live passively in a
neighborhood controlled by The Mob or is it better to risk death or injury in an effort to defeat
The Mob for the benefit of civilized posterity? Will Europe have the will to support the
threat, or infliction, of enough pain on Syria to force it to abandon its covert support of
Hezbollah (in collaboration with Iran)? Is the eye-doctor ruler of Syria near-sighted,
far-sighted or blind? He says he's "no Saddam Hussein," but if he were to really
want to send a "signal" to the West, he should show that he's "no Hafez
Assad." The latter seems unlikely since apples rarely fall far from the tree.
Wrenn, Editor at PoliSat.Com.
14, 2005 #01 Daily Update at PoliSat.Com,
where satire is always
commentary, but commentary
isn't always satire.
link to this Daily Update: http://polisat.com/du2005/du0503-11--20.htm#20050314-01.
30-day news-link: http://polisat.com/DailyPoliticalSatire-Commentary/du20y05m03d14-01.htm
link to the non-animated illustration for this Daily Update:
links to the latest Daily Updates, Animations, Song-Parodies, Limericks, Palindromes, Archives, Site-Index/Search, go to http://PoliSat.Com.