About Archives (Old Archives) Contact Search PoliticalxRay/PoliSat.Com News Troops |
News in war on terrorism Frequent-flyer miles for troops Salute America's Heroes Fallen-Heroes-Fund Thanks-to-Troops Katrina-Aid |
·
Backfire. ·
November 4, 2006--
Backfire of the "Exposing Bush On Iraq" campaign invoking half-hindsight attacks conceptually indistinguishable from "single-entry accounting"-- something that should be easily understood by "well-educated, smart people" like John Kerry.·
Silent Preview (above) "play" below for MiniVideo version |
"Backfire " For in-page viewing of larger versions, click here for permanent URL or find it by title in PoliSat.Com's index--here. powered by GlobalWeb.Net To view the video in a stand-alone media player, use permanent links: To display this permanent-links box for this video on a website or blog click here for the copy/paste code. To display on a website or blog an automatically-updating MiniVideo Box to play whatever is the latest PoliSat.Com Video, click here for copy/paste codes for variety of sizes & configurations. |
Political slogans abound for "change" without statements of grounds set forth to explain the type of the "change" to show if it's sound or unsound.
The act of demanding a "change" without stating grounds to explain the "change" to unfold in "tactics" or "goals," reveals not "design" but "disdain."
In hindsight, there's wisdom abounding, but hindsight selectively founded on good but not bad effects it could have is fraudulent, one-side accounting.
"If Bush hadn't toppled Hussein, 'twould be," says half-hindsight's refrain, "much better, not worse." What's true? The reverse: For nukes, enough time he'd have gained.
Though full-hindsight wouldn't exchange the chaos from toppling Hussein for leaving Saddam with nukes to be armed, it can't prevent half-hindsight blame.
So half-hindsight's "change" won't be feared, the words must be vague and unclear: Avoiding "defeat" and likewise "retreat" with words like "advance to the rear."
And who would be fooled by such drama? It surely will not be Usama, or Persian Iran or goons of Saddam. The answer: the "stars" of such drama.
|
Political slogans abound for "change" without statements of grounds set forth to explain the type of the "change" to show if it's sound or unsound. The act of demanding a "change" without stating grounds to explain the "change" to unfold in "tactics" or "goals," reveals not "design" but "disdain."
In hindsight, there's wisdom abounding, but hindsight selectively founded on good but not bad effects it could have is fraudulent, one-side accounting. "If Bush hadn't toppled Hussein, 'twould be," says half-hindsight's refrain, "much better, not worse." What's true? The reverse: For nukes, enough time he'd have gained.
Though full-hindsight wouldn't exchange the chaos from toppling Hussein for leaving Saddam with nukes to be armed, it can't prevent half-hindsight blame. So half-hindsight's "change" won't be feared, the words must be vague and unclear: Avoiding "defeat" and likewise "retreat" with words like "advance to the rear."
And who would be fooled by such drama? It surely will not be Usama, or Persian Iran or goons of Saddam. The answer: the "stars" of such drama.
If the voting on November 7, 2006, produces what many current polls predict, authors of the half-hindsight self-delusion will begin attempting to force Bush onto the unreal stage of their drama. Since the polls (including exit polls) were so dramatically wrong in 2004, there's still hope that common-sense, full-bore hindsight will prevail.
With respect to the video, "Backfire," Hat-Tip* to
HotAir regarding "Halp Us
Jon Carry" and Hat-Tip** to JohnZeigler.Com
regarding the video of what John Kerry retroactively tried to characterize as a botched joke rather
than a Freudian slip. For in-page viewing of of a small-size version of the video, use
the video-boxes above. For stand-alone viewing, use any of the size/speed links in the lower
portion of the vertical box at the left. For larger/smaller versions, go to the permanent url
for this installment at http://PoliSat.Com/Backfire.htm.
--Jim Wrenn, Editor at
PoliSat.Com.
Hat-Tips:
*HotAir's
AllahPundit: [http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/01/video-kerrys-speech-at-the-angelides-event-uncut/]
**Radio
talk-show host John Ziegler [http://www.johnziegler.com/editorial.php?e=208] Note:
The permanent link to this installment is http://PoliSat.Com/Backfire.htm.
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bE1wY5fbpA&eurl=];
Kerry soundbite: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Ve4JoY5GA&mode=related&search=].
Sites that Feature PoliSat.Com:
|