2004 - "Exit-Poll Disinformation Hoax Backfires?" Part
Election Reform: Count Votes - No More Winner
Projections by Democrat Manipulated Exit Polls
Election Reform: Count Votes - No More Winner Projections by Democrat Manipulated Exit Polls
Permanent Link: http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m02d19-01.asp.
[March 5, 2005]
Col. John H. Wambough, Jr
Exit-Poll Data to De-legitimize the Republican Presidency - Whether the CACTECH/MIT
Voting Technology Project (and
December 5th Addendum) or analysis being done by statisticians such as Stephen F.
Freeman (who likely understates sampling errors
for Election 2004 exit polls), statistical analysis has mainly been
focused on the backend of the exit-poll controversy (on data that emerged
after polls closed). My concerns are at the front-end with the early
disinformation data (before any polls closed) that hoodwinked the American people into
believing Kerry would win the election. Why would any exit-polling company circulate data
to the broadcast Networks that Kerry was winning in a landslide in
with manipulated exit polls and pre-election polls of choice, senior level Democrats are now
on a mission to de-legitimize Election 2004 and hence the Presidency.
It is not surprising that some Democrats are in a state of denial and others are
hallucinating that they didn’t really lose Election 2004. They
will not accept GWB won the election and are now deluding themselves into believing
manipulated exit poll samples were correct and actual voting results were wrong.
satisfy their delusion that the exit polls were correct, Democrats must assert that Real
Clear Poll Averages and Automated
Polls taken just prior to the election and Actual
Voting Results of the election were all wrong or fraudulent. For those that believe this,
I commend them to a New York Times article: Who
Lost Ohio? by Matt Bai. To cut to the chase, go to page eight and start reading the
paragraph "Why wasn't it enough? (And then finish the article). This should help everyone
understand how Election 2004 was won by GWB.
you haven’t done so, read “Exit
Poll Outrage” and "Those
Faulty Exit Polls were Sabotage" by Dick Morris. Like Morris, I believe that exit
polls were gamed to help Kerry win the election. Although there may be explanations for
manipulated data, there is no excuse for the Networks' financed raw data (disinformation)
being paraded over the Internet on Election Day. After the Election 2000
said he favored abandoning the release of "waves" of exit poll results to the
networks early in the day; so why was his pollster company sending exit-poll results
to the Networks as early as
as we heard for four years how GWB stole the election from Gore in 2000 (which he didn’t-more disinformation),
expect to hear over the next four years that GWB stole the election from Kerry. The reality of
GWB winning Election 2004 by around 3 million votes and receiving the largest popular vote in
Democrats attack electronic voting machines, suggest that they read "Voting
Machines and the Underestimate of the Bush Vote" by CALTECH/MIT Voting
Technology Project. The project concludes: "There is no evidence that electronic voting
machines were used to steal the 2004 election for George Bush." Also, it asks a
provocative question: "Which
is more likely -- that an exit polling system that has been consistently wrong and troubled
turned out to be wrong and troubled again, or that a vast conspiracy carried
out by scores and scores of county and state election officials was successfully carried off
to distort millions of American votes? I think the Kerry campaign concluded that the former is
The “November Surprise” for Election 2004 was the National Networks’ raw exit-poll data showing up on the Internet early afternoon on Election Day. Their purpose was to create a lethal effect on Republican voter turnout and gain Election Day campaign momentum for Kerry. The Internet enabled manipulated data to be disseminated to the American people without overt involvement of the National Networks. Since Kerry’s bid for the Presidency failed, phase two of the Democrat strategy is now being fully implemented (de-legitimize the election). Many of the tactics implemented by Democrat Party to de-legitimize Election 2004, you can be sure were mapped out well before the election took place. Review their tactics:
our elections to those of
Alleging that exit polls are infallible thus the election must have been stolen by
Having statisticians state that the exit polls were accurate. Some Democrat
statisticians will consider exit polls accurate unless presented with irrefutable proof of
Accusing voting machine manufacturers of conspiring with right-wing politicians to
steal the election.
Blaming Republicans for everything that didn’t go well for the Democrats on
Blaming Republicans for not having sufficient voting locations and voting machines
for Democrat high population voting areas.
Blaming Republicans for manipulating the tabulations.
may appreciate that: (1) there are excellent reasons for every citizen to question
the credibility of exit-poll data displayed to the American people on Election Day; (2) the
Democrat Party disenfranchised their own people (if you can call it disenfranchisement) by
failing to ensure the correct number of voting machines were placed in their districts and
that they had sufficient voter locations; (3) the Republicans waited in polling locations as
long as Democrats - seven plus hours; the record turnout of voters took everyone by surprise
(Democrats, Republicans and Independents); (4) Democrats,
Republicans and Independents have many similar voting challenges and issues;
(5) voting machine errors / problems / irregularities / waiting on lines affect
Republicans and Independents as well as Democrats; (6) court challenges to Election 2004 was
the post-election strategy of the Democrat Party – that is why there were thousands of
lawyers this election. (7) Even the punch card voting system came under legal challenge; and
(8) there were complaints of no paper trails with electronic voting - something Democrats knew
before the Election (8) there are multiple checks and balances in place to preclude
about the integrity of our voting system should support some form of National Voter
ID. Everyone that votes in a National Election should have a National ID (National
Identification Number) that would insure they vote only once in elections. Every vote can then
be tracked back to an ID number which, in effect, validates that the person who is voting is a
citizen of this country and eligible to vote in the National Election.
Democrats lost more than an election at the polls. (See "Democratic Disaster" by Robert Novak and "The Election 2004" by Cal Thomas). Some reasons why Democrats lost were addressed by Democrat Zell Miller in "A National Party No More" and Audio. Before anyone seeks to de-legitimize Election 2004, they should first understand what the exit polls say and why people voted the way they did. Knowing the shifts in the voting behavior of the population should be helpful to those who want to understand why GWB won the election. Suggest reading: “A Tour of the 2004 Exit Poll: What it Says and What it Doesn’t” By Roy Telxeira. Actions focused on fixing real voting problems are to be commended; however, strategies that de-legitimize our national elections and undermine the confidence of our citizens in the voting process do not serve our Nation well.
Permanent Link to Part I: http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m01d07-01.asp.
Permanent Link to Part II: http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m01d31-01.asp.
Permanent Link to Part III: http://wrenncom.com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m02d05-01.asp.
Permanent Link to Part IV: http://wrenncom.com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m02d19-01.asp.
Permanent Link to Part V: http://wrenncom.com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m03d05-01.asp
Part VI to be published soon. (Editor's note: The delay in publishing Parts II and the remaining parts is attributable to scheduling problems of the Editor rather than any delay on the part of Col. Wambough. Editor apologizes for these delays.)
·support our troops, support Bush, support Cheney, support victory in Iraq, support victory in Afghanistan, Clinton Liebrary, http://PoliSat.Com , PoliSatDOTcom, Salute America's Heroes, Fallen Heroes Fund, oppose Gore's Global Warming theory, support milblogs, Michael Yon, Pat Dollard, BlackFive, MilBlogs, MilBlogging, Michael Yon, Mudville Gazette, HotAir.Com, JawaReport, PajamasMedia , VictoryCaucus , VetsForFreedom , FreedomsWatch , DayByDayCartoon , WrennCom.Com , Video , Political Satire, Politics, News, oppose MoveOn.Org, oppose Code Pink, oppose DailyKos, oppose ANSWER, support PoliSat.Com, support WrennCom.Com, ·
Other sites that feature PoliSat.Com's Political Satire/Commentary-- Click here to view our Affiliates page.