2004 - "Exit-Poll Disinformation Hoax Backfires?" Part
Election Reform: Count Votes - No More Winner
Projections by Democrat Manipulated Exit Polls
Election Reform: Count Votes - No More Winner Projections by Democrat Manipulated Exit Polls
Permanent Link: http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m02d05-01.asp.
[February 5, 2005]
Col. John H. Wambough, Jr
National Election Pool (NEP) Exit-Poll Interviews –
on Election Day the National Networks’ raw exit-poll data was
posted on the Internet showing Kerry winning the National Election in a landslide. From the
standpoint of the American voter, this data was projecting / forecasting / indicating the
winner of the National Election and it was doing so before a single poll had closed in any
state. Stringent Network standards for projecting or calling a state over
the national airways mean little when the Internet is used as an alternative avenue
for subverting the electoral process.
have alleged that there has been no explanation why exit polls were so far off on Election
Day. So here is an explanation. Gaming NEP exit-poll
interviews may have had a lot to do with it. The exit-poll system is easy to game. Just as
misleading data (disinformation) was quickly leaked to the Internet, hypothesize that
a list of exit-poll interviewer locations (usually 40-50
per swing state) along with the planned sequencing of interviews were
leaked to the DNC, Kerry Campaign and 527
groups before Election Day. With this information, exit-poll data collection could be
manipulated to favor Kerry by flooding known survey locations with Kerry operatives early
in the morning on Election Day.
Kerry supporters would have been pre-briefed
on tactics for getting exit-poll interviews (how to be an anxious volunteer). See Warren
Mitofsky’s (co-director of NEP) comment “that the Kerry
voters were more anxious to participate in our exit polls than the Bush voters.”
It is not reassuring to Republicans that the manipulated data was the result of anxious
participants (Democrats) in early exit-poll interviews?
All these years of polling and no one ever came
across "the anxious exit-poll participant phenomenon" until Election 2004,
amazing! What good is exit-poll data if tactics are being used to skew data
into disinformation to help win elections for the Democrat Party? See Michael
Barone Article (4th paragraph on Exit Polls).
the effort to deceive the American people were more sinisterly contrived than flooding
swing-state polls with anxious participants (Democrats) that like to do exit-poll
surveys, then further chicanery would have included the
enlistment of Kerry friendly interviewers to
conduct the surveys.
To do the surveys, interviewers would have to know the
precinct names, polling locations and interview procedures. This information could be
passed along to Democrat operatives.
Either flooding pollster locations with Kerry
supporters (anxious to participate in exit-poll surveys) or use of Kerry
friendly interviewers to conduct the surveys (or a combination of both tactics)
would result in manipulated exit-poll data early on Election Day.
addition to anxious exit poll participants, over surveying Kerry voters and under surveying
Bush voters (in each swing state) are unambiguous indications of manipulation. How do you
under represent Bush voters across the board except by design or incompetence
in what you are doing?
Congress needs to investigate: (1) how the collection of exit-poll data was being gamed and manipulated to benefit Kerry and the Democrat Party (2) Who were the willing accomplices to this deception? (3) Did the DNC, Kerry Campaign or 527 Groups suggest any sample precincts or polling locations used by the pollsters? (4) Did the DNC, Kerry Campaign or 527 Group people play any part (with the pollster companies) in the recruitment of exit-poll interviewers? (5) How thorough was the training of exit-pollsters (and other people working in the system); who trained them and what were their instructions? (6) Did the DNC, Kerry Campaign or 527 Group people have any role in survey data tabulation or in the data gathering / handling process either at the polls or at the Edison-Mitofsky polling companies? (7) Did the DNC, Kerry Campaign or 527 Group people have any communications with the National Networks asking them not to announce states for GWB and did the National Networks comply with their requests? (8) What role was played (in the exit-poll scandal) by the National Networks, subscribers to the pollster service, pollster companies, DNC, Kerry Campaign or 527 Groups? (9) Why didn’t pollster company executives put an immediate stop on exit-poll raw data that was highly suspect, that looked unreasonable, that was so out of whack with pre-election poll averages and that was so clearly prejudiced in favor of Kerry? (10) Of the twelve experts that make exit-poll data decisions, how many are Republicans? (11) What safeguards were in place to preclude misleading exit-poll data (disinformation) being presented to the American people early on Election Day – on the Internet blogosphere and media outlets? (12) Who were the leakers of exit-poll data? (13) What should the American people expect during Elections 2006 and 2008? Since exit-poll raw data has been repeatedly used to influence Presidential Election outcomes in favor of Democrats, should exit poll forecasting of the Presidential winner be continued? This is a question for Congress should address.
polling in Elections 2000 and 2004 gave great advantage to Democrats at the expense of
GWB. On Election Day 2004, the National Election Pool (NEP) sent out six separate releases of
exit-poll results to the National
Networks and subscribers
– each one showing Kerry in the lead. The
last wave of national exit polls showed Kerry winning the popular vote by 51 percent to 48
numbers are symbolic of a systematic bias favoring Kerry in nationwide exit polls).
The practice of indicating the Presidential winner using manipulated exit-poll data must be terminated. If Election 2004 shenanigans aren’t dealt with now, they will be at a later date when disastrous consequences result from the Networks' use of manipulated exit polls to interfere with voter behavior during National Elections. Read "Exit Poll Outrage" and "Those Faulty Exit Polls were Sabotage" by Dick Morris. Gaming NEP exit poll interviews, Democrat friendly demographics (skewed sampling) and a deficient pollster polling methodology – all combined to produce manipulated exit-poll data on Election Day. Our National Elections involve the trust of our people in an open and fair system. Having the National Networks and its Pollster Company's interfere (in a very significant way) with Election 2004 via disinformation is alarming but then to declare what they did proprietary is truly insulting to the public conscience. What we are witnessing is a collision between Public and Private Interests that need to be reconciled by Congress in favor of the American people. Count votes - no more winner projections using manipulated exit polls.
Permanent Link to Part I: http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m01d07-01.asp.
Permanent Link to Part II: http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2005/20y05m01d31-01.asp.
Part IV to be published soon. (Editor's note: The delay in publishing Parts II and the remaining parts is attributable to scheduling problems of the Editor rather than any delay on the part of Col. Wambough. Editor apologizes for these delays.)
·support our troops, support Bush, support Cheney, support victory in Iraq, support victory in Afghanistan, Clinton Liebrary, http://PoliSat.Com , PoliSatDOTcom, Salute America's Heroes, Fallen Heroes Fund, oppose Gore's Global Warming theory, support milblogs, Michael Yon, Pat Dollard, BlackFive, MilBlogs, MilBlogging, Michael Yon, Mudville Gazette, HotAir.Com, JawaReport, PajamasMedia , VictoryCaucus , VetsForFreedom , FreedomsWatch , DayByDayCartoon , WrennCom.Com , Video , Political Satire, Politics, News, oppose MoveOn.Org, oppose Code Pink, oppose DailyKos, oppose ANSWER, support PoliSat.Com, support WrennCom.Com, ·
Other sites that feature PoliSat.Com's Political Satire/Commentary-- Click here to view our Affiliates page.