·support our troops, support Bush, support Cheney, support victory in Iraq, support victory in Afghanistan,  Clinton Liebrary, http://PoliSat.Com , PoliSatDOTcom, Salute America's Heroes, Fallen Heroes Fund, oppose Gore's Global Warming theory, support milblogs, Michael Yon, Pat Dollard, BlackFive, MilBlogs, MilBlogging, Michael Yon, Mudville Gazette, HotAir.Com, JawaReport, PajamasMedia , VictoryCaucus , VetsForFreedom , FreedomsWatch , DayByDayCartoon , WrennCom.Com , Video , Political Satire, Politics, News, oppose MoveOn.Org, oppose Code Pink, oppose DailyKos, oppose ANSWER, support PoliSat.Com, support WrennCom.Com, ·

 

WWW PoliSat.Com 

  First Things First:  Salute America's Heroes · Fallen Heroes Fund · Frequent-Flyer-Miles for Troops · Thanks to Troops · Military News ··  MilBlogs ·

  Home · Posts:  Current /Recent · Videos/Toons/Songs:  Latest · Embed-Codes · Text Index · Images Index · Archives:  Old · New · About · Contact · Syndication · Affiliates ·

News  Sources/Papers/Magazines   Pundits  Blogs   ThinkTanks   What is "property"?   Pantheopians   Global Climate   Asteroids/Comets Hitting Earth--Risks/Predictions    Science   GlobalWeb  

 

Bull Dung··
April 18, 2003:  PoliSat.Com's Political Satire/Commentary Daily Update #01··™©·2003··
··
Petroskey, I'm sorry you said you are "sorry."·

Petroskey for baseball had hit a home-run*  
in telling Sarandon and Robbins "Don't come--
Your presence ain't groovey
to honor your movie,
'Bull Durham,'" but now his home-run he's undone.

Responding to Tim in his crybaby state,**  
Petroskey in error implies a mistake
was calling it off
by mail without talk,
and thus he's refusing to step-on home-plate.

In "hindsight" he calls it an impolite act
in failing to call before sending the fax
in hopes they'd eschew
contemptible views
as though their mere silence could clean-up their act.

The right of free speech allows people to choose
to speak on behalf of contemptible views,
but doesn't oblige
that others provide
a platform of honor in spite of their views.

But Robbins' response to Petroskey's "I'm sorry,"
exemplifies why he should not say "I'm sorry,"
'cause Robbins' reply
attempts to belie
that Dale 'stead of Tim should be saying "I'm sorry."··
·




    Inspired by an April 18, 2003, news report about a letter Petroskey published to say he's "sorry" for not having called Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon before issuing his cancellation of the planned Hall of Fame celebration of the 15th anniversary of Bull Durham.    Because Petroskey's letter expressed regret for not having called Robbins and Sarandon before canceling the event but not for the decision to cancel it, Robbins characterized it as a "non-apology apology."  
    In typical style of a narcissistic celebrity, Robbins asserted that "Petroskey's actions resulted in a bipartisan, nationwide affirmation of free speech and the First Amendment," which obviously was not the result.  Any alleged "nationwide affirmation" related to mere manners rather than "free speech and the First Amendment."   Petroskey's cancellation of the celebration had nothing to do with infringement of free speech.  Instead, it exemplified the exercise of rights of free speech and free association to express distaste for, and to refuse to
accord the dignity of social acceptability to, such passionate proponents of such contemptible views.  
    Just as Petroskey would have been right to withdraw an invitation to someone who had chosen to make himself a passionate spokesman for racist views, he was equally right to have withdrawn the invitation to Robbins and Sarandon in light of their passionate promotion of vitriolic views deemed highly offensive by an overwhelming majority of sensible Americans.  This was especially so at a time when the risks to American military forces varied inversely in relation to the Hussein regime's false perception (which had just recently been reinforced by Peter Arnett
***) that there was a growing (rather than shrinking) anti-war sentiment among influential Americans (rather than those losing influence and respect) such that tactics to protract the conflict or increase casualties would lead to a political solution satisfactory to the Butcher of Baghdad.
·
*·To read/view "Petroskey's home run-- an error undone," go here.
·
**·To read/view "Though Robbins loves dishing it out, as dishee, he's a whiner who pouts," go here.
·
***·To view/read about Baby Milk Factory II, go here, and Arnett's Fog on the Mirror, go here.
 --Jim Wrenn, Editor@PoliSat.Com.
·

Direct link for this
Update: ·http://polisat.com/du2003/du030430.htm#20030418-01·™©2003.
| Get Political-Satire Daily Updates by email | Become a PoliSat.Com Affiliate | Tell a friend about us | Search Polisat.Com |
..
..
··
April 16, 2003:  PoliSat.Com's Political Satire/Commentary Daily Update #01··™©·2003··
·
Though Robbins loves dishing it out, 
on being dish-ee, he's a whiner who pouts.
·

Though Robbins loves dishing it out,
his speech to the press removes doubt
that being dish-ee
has caused him to be
a whiner who cries and who pouts.

Click image at left to view animated version.··
·
·
    Tim Robbins has said many outrageously offensive things, but among the things he's done I found the most offensive was his behavior at a London anti-war rally I witnessed on C-SPAN.  Not only did he attribute to mere motives for "profit" the plans for use of force to disarm Saddam Hussein, he joined hands and raised arms with the Mayor of London immediately after the Mayor characterized America's war on terror as a "racist" war and characterized Bush as "the most racist President in American history."  (Ostensibly, he agrees with Belafonte that Colin Powell, Condi Rice and Rod Paige aren't really "black" or are merely "house slaves.")  Such irresponsible statements and behavior merely reinforce hate-speech so prevalent in the Arab press, which still contends the CIA and the Mossad flew the airliners into the Towers and the Pentagon.
    Yet in speaking before the National Press Club today, Robbins seems amazed that people such as I find his behavior so offensive that we would rather walk through broken glass than have one more penny of our money ever find its way into his pocket.  It's a free country and people such as Robbins are free to make asses of themselves and as well as being free to whine like babies when people with better sense express their utter contempt for them and choose to have nothing further to do with them.  
    His whining about Petroskey's cancellation of the Baseball Hall of Fame "celebration" of the 15th anniversary of Bull Durham and his other complaints about being so harshly criticized for his anti-war demagoguery manifest his fundamental lack of understanding of the right of free speech.  (He seems to think "free speech" is an "entitlement" rather than a right-- a distinction apparently beyond his intellectual capacity.)  It's irrelevant whether Robbins had planned to make political statements (or even promised not to do so) at the Hall of Fame event.  To have allowed him onto the platform would have been a form of speech by the Hall of Fame.  Given the spectacle he's made of himself, his mere presence would have been a form of speech-- an embarrassment to the Hall of Fame and a source of disgust to most of its supporters.  If those who have entrusted such judgmental decisions to Petroskey find the judgment he exercised on their behalf to have been offensive, they can fire him.  I'm sure they won't.
    One who has made a public spectacle of himself by willfully and repeatedly exhibiting contemptible behavior does not have a "right" to appear on anybody else's platform because the very act of allowing such appearance accords tacit dignity to the one who has achieved well-deserved notoriety for contemptible behavior.  I have no doubt that if Robbins were to have recently begun passionately endorsing segregationist policies rather than trashing America's motives in Iraq, Petroskey would have made the same decision.  Both kinds of behavior are fundamentally offensive, in my opinion, to the vast majority of people whom the Baseball Hall of Fame seeks to serve.  
    Pete Rose merely gambled on Baseball-- he's banned from baseball.  Jimmy the Greek merely made offensive statements that slavery had somehow contributed to the athletic skills of blacks-- he was immediately fired.  Another baseball official, whose name I can't recall, lost his job years ago after making what some interpreted as racially patronizing statements to Ted Koppel on Nightline in an interview in which the official's very purpose in being a guest on Nightline was to honor and laud Jackie Robinson as a pioneer against racism.  
    In my opinion, Robbins is lower than pond scum and a crybaby to boot.  That's why I, and I think many other Americans, will consciously strive to avoid even mere pennies of our money ever again finding their way into the pockets of Robbins, Sarandon, Martin Sheen, Mike Farrell, Janeane Garofalo, Ed Asner, and a host of other entertainers suffering delusions of importance and intellectual acuity.  To metaphorically paraphrase an old cliche:   "Those who live by the free market, die by the free market."  --Jim Wrenn, Editor@PoliSat.Com.
·

Direct link for this
Update: ·http://polisat.com/du2003/du030430.htm#20030416-01·™©2003.
··
April 10, 2003:  PoliSat.Com's Political Satire/Commentary  
Daily Update #01·
·™©·2003··
·
Petroskey's home-run:  An error undone.·

    A Hall of Fame error has now been undone: 
    By telling Sarandon and Robbins "Don't come--
    You're presence ain't groovey
    to honor your movie,
    Bull Durham," the error's become a home-run.

Click image at left to view the animation
·
·
Inspired by an April 9, 2003, report that Dale Petroskey, President of the Baseball Hall of Fame, canceled a 15th-year-anniversary "celebration" of the baseball movie, "Bull Durham," at which Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins, who starred in the movie, were scheduled to appear.  In canceling the event, Petroskey cited the Hall of Fame's unwillingness to host an event that could provide a platform for Sarandon and Robbins to express their hostility toward our military action in Iraq.  Laughably, Robbins' indignant response criticized Petroskey for using his "position at the Hall of Fame to make a political statement."  Exemplifying his utter lack of understanding of the fundamental notions of free speech, Robbins further characterized the Hall of Fame's refusal to serve as a platform for Robbins' and Sarandon's political views as somehow "dishonor[ing] 'patriotism' and 'freedom.'"  --Jim Wrenn, Editor@PoliSat.Com.
·