Thank You to George W. Bush a.k.a. Bush 43 and Our Troops That We're Not Also Facing a Nuclear-Armed Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Nuclear-Armed Ghadaffi in Libya.

Today, on the day of the official opening of the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum, it is particularly appropriate to say "Thank you" to Bush 43 (and our troops) for having prevented our being confronted today with a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein in Iraq and a nuclear-armed Ghadaffi in Libya. These are two monumental accomplishments by Bush 43 (and our troops). Watch the video:

Here's the text for each frame of "Thank-You Bush 43"

To show the full breadth of success
from toppling Saddam, I digress
by journeying back
in time a few tracks
for context preceding success.

'Twas not fully known when the mission
began to prevent Saddam's fission
that Khan was a schooler
of Libya's ruler
progressing towards bombs using fission.

Soon after the launch of the mission
for ending Saddam's hopes for fission,
it seemed that Hussein
again might remain
in power despite Dubya's mission.

And when, after statues were toppled,
Saddam, whose regime appeared hobbled,
eluded escape,
Qadhaffi had faith
Saddam would undo being toppled.

But later, we captured Hussein
which thereupon made it quite plain
although he remained
alive it was plain
he'd never hold power again.

And more was attained than preemption
of hopes by Saddam to make fission,
but strident Bush critics--
with views thus constricted--
ignore the full fruits of this mission.

What critics ignore, I explain:
On news that we'd captured Hussein
Qadhafi confessed
(from fear he'd be next):
"From working on Nukes I'll refrain."

Qadhafi then showed to the West
his progress towards nukes he could test
and also agreed
his program could be
removed and destroyed by the West.

But what would have happened, alas,
if Dubya had taken a pass
on toppling Hussein?
Not hard to explain,
if first we go Back to the Past:

His critics' re-writings of hist'ry
(accounting with one-sided entries)
with cruxes excluded
can best be refuted
by pairing correlative entries.

This trip to the past will affix
to hist'ry what critics had picked
as what should be done,
then forward time's run
to show what would now be transfixed.

Including each crux then in play
yields "what would've happened" displays
had critics prevailed.
For that, I unveil:
"Rewind, then Rewrite, then Replay."

If critics the Dubya had heeded
by letting Saddam remain seated
in power, Saddam
would now have The Bomb
with likewise Qadhafi proceeding.

And chances are zip, zero, none
Iran would stop nuke-work begun
to counter Saddam's
acquiring The Bomb--
Indeed, they'd blame us for his Bomb.

And Gore would by now have hurled claims
at Dubya which would be the same
as thoseº² that Gore pushed
against "Daddy" Bush
for NOT having toppled Hussein.

You doubt Gore would stoop to such shame?
Search "WrennCom" plus "GoreOnHussein"
plus "PersianGulfWar"
for rantings of Gore
at Bush 41 re Hussein.

'Twas after the Persian Gulf War
that Candidate, Albert A. Gore,
trashed Bush 41
for what left undone?
Deposing Hussein in that war.

Thus, Gore and the Left would now claim:
If Dubya had toppled Hussein,
the folks in Iran
would not want The Bomb,
for which they on Bush would heap blame.

To undo this alternate future,
again we go back and un-suture
such alternate way
for Hist'ry to play,
and then we come Back to the Future.

Though still we have grounds for alarm:
Korea up North and Iran
want Nukes to make threats,
Bush ended such threats
in Libya and in Iraq.

Moreover, what's shown above-left
reveals what we'd face if the Left's
proposals had won
post 2001:
'Twould double the risks Dubya left.

Instead, what's displayed above right,
though still quite a dangerous plight,
makes clear Bush reduced
from four down to two
the sources for nuclear fights.

Though Bush by the Left has been pilloried,
in hist'ry, his real valedictory
as Bush the Defeater
of Leftist Appeasers
will be his enabling our victory.

To whom are our thanks most deserving
for steadfast, courageous, unswerving
fidelity to
what freedom can do?
Both Bush and our troops bravely serving.