·support our
troops, support Bush, support Cheney, support victory in Iraq, support victory in Afghanistan,
Clinton Liebrary, http://PoliSat.Com
, PoliSatDOTcom, Salute America's Heroes, Fallen Heroes Fund, oppose Gore's Global Warming theory, support milblogs, Michael Yon, Pat Dollard, BlackFive, MilBlogs, MilBlogging, Michael Yon, Mudville Gazette, HotAir.Com, JawaReport, PajamasMedia , VictoryCaucus , VetsForFreedom ,
FreedomsWatch , DayByDayCartoon , WrennCom.Com , Video , Political Satire, Politics, News, oppose MoveOn.Org, oppose Code Pink, oppose DailyKos, oppose ANSWER, support PoliSat.Com, support WrennCom.Com, ·
For multiple connection-speed versions of latest video, go here.
For MiniVideo version, go here.
Lions
for Lambs movie exposes Robert Redford, Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise as LambChops for Lions in
Hollywood Left's anti-McCain campaign commercial posing as a movie.·
By
Jim Wrenn,
Editor
and Washington Bureau Drawer Chief at PoliSat.Com.
November
10, 2007--
The latest in a series of anti-war, anti-Bush propanda emanating from Hollywood thinly (indeed, nano-thinly)
disguised as a "movie" is "Lions
for Lambs" unwittingly exposing Robert Redford, Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise as
"LambChops for Lions" in what amounts to an anti-McCain campaign commercial on behalf of
the candidates favored by the Hollywood Left. Years ago, people using common sense deemed the
"McCain/Feingold" campaign finance "reform" law not only unconstitutional but
likely to have the effect of disarming center and right-of-center political campaigns while leaving
the Hollywood Left with "gold plated" propaganda weapons supported by virtually unlimited,
unregulated funds. Such people take no satisfaction in now repeating to John McCain,
"We told you so." That the Hollywood Left's propaganda may politically injury McCain
in the minds of so-called "independents" and "middle-roaders," who pay scant
attention to history as it unfolds on a daily basis, is unfair to McCain is a minor problem compared
to the damage McCain/Feingold is doing to the country by placing all political views other than the
Hollywood Left at an extreme disadvantage.
By PoliSat-Com overheard: McCain's muttered words when he learned how Hollywood
"clams" for "Lions and Lambs" were spent so McCain would be spurned. The
"Maverick" (McCain) said: "Shazaam! The movie named 'Lions for Lambs' makes
perfectly plain that "Cruise" is "McCain" and Redford's 'Obama' sans tan."
"When campaign 'reform' I did start to limit the campaigning arts, I erred not including
political movies-- I'm hoisted upon my petard."
"So now, with the limits imposed on candidates, parties and pros but not on the darts in
Hollywood's arts, I"m wounded by Cruise as me posed." "To stop it, I'll
need to resort to pleadings requesting a court
to promptly declare 'reform' that I dared is trumped by free-speech ever more."
So many of us tried to show McCain what "reform" would impose, but John wouldn't listen so
now he must listen to us say "We toldeth you so." (Perhaps
as you're reading, you mind perceives this in rhythm and rhyme; so if you prefer the format of
verse, go
here where it's writ line-by-line.)
Who has the financial clout and production skills to counter Hollywood's "Lions for Lambs"
campaign-ad? Does not McCain/Feingold unconstitutionally limit the capacity of political
parties, candidates, their supporters, grass-roots organizations, etc. to effectively counter such
naked propaganda? Of course it does. Are we who opposed McCain/Feingold now entitled to
say "We told you so"? Of course we are, but there's no satisfaction in that.
How can opponents of such naked propaganda counter it? Here's one of my meager attempts at http://PoliSat.Com/BaseballFootballAndWar.htm
(which includes a windows movie video) or, if you insist on giving traffic to Google/Gorgle,
you can view the video on YouTube at http://youtube.com/watch?v=1ww3VocsYFc.
The only "good" news is that at least so far, the Hollywood Left's most recent
hurt-America-in-order-to-hurt Bush "blockbusters" may prove to be wallet-busters for the
Hollywood Left, but given the scope of resources they possess and their fanatical willingness to
expend them hurting America in order to hurt Bush, there's little cause for optimism. The only
thing that will ever get their attention is when enough consumers stand up on their hind legs in the
market place and say "Enough." (Unfortunately, a rapidly expanding "venue"
for Hollywood's hurt-American-in-order-to-hurt-Bush campaign is in those parts of the world where
such propaganda is welcomed by those recruiting fanatics to kill American troops.) With
respect to the Hollywood Left spewing their propaganda in the cocoon of freedom being protected by
American troops, I paraphrase what Churchill said after greatly outnumbered British pilots won the
"Battle of Britain": "Never before in human conflict has so much been owed to
so few by so many idiotic, hateful ingrates."
Events
expose YouTube's political water-boarding of PoliSat.Com by banning Usama Girl video and
WretchBoarding video.· Go
here.
October
13, 2007--
Since
winning the "Peace Prize," will Gore rely upon MoveOn_Dot_Org for "in kind"
support enabling Al Gore to campaign for POTUS once more?·--Go
here.
October
13, 2007--
The
Peace Prize in Olso for Gore so clearly has brought to the fore the aura, do tell, of Alfred Nobel,
that Earth's foremost poet lauds Gore.-- Go
here.
September
30, 2007--
Betrayal-101--
"Phony" soldiers: MoveOn.Org and MediaMatters.Org shoot selves (and Al Gore) in
groin in smearing Rush Limbaugh, George Bush and Gen. Petraeus as "Betray US" on Iraq.
-- Go
here.
September 28, 2007--
Obama
Girl, Hillary Girl, Breck Girl, and Ron Paul Girl spawn Usama Girl video as Campaign 2008 enters
"Girls Gone Wild" phase. -- Go
here.
September 23, 2007--
Winston
Churchill on the Battle of D.C.-- Go
here.
September 21, 2007--
Alan
Greenspan was right that Iraq war is "about oil" because it's "about [toppling a
terror-supporting, genocidal, totalitarian regime that had spent, and would now be spending, vast]
oil [revenues on WMDs]."-- Go
here.
For the
installment immediately preceding this one use the temporary list at the top of this page. For
archives of older installments, go here.
To find other, prior installments, use the recent-video links at the top of this page or find prior
installments in PoliSat.Com's Archives.
