More on the Life of Julia:  Breastfeeding Mom on Cover of Time Magazine Exemplifies How Attachment Mothers Are Joining the LGBT "Out for Obama" Campaign.·

By Jim Wrenn, Editor, PoliSat.Com , PoliticalXray.Com . 
May 13, 2012-- 

            Jamie Lynne Grumet, the Mom featured on Time Magazine cover breastfeeding her nearly four-year-old son, exemplifies how Attachment Moms are joining the LGBT "Out For Obama" campaign. 

More on the Life of Julia: Attachment-Motherhood Mom featured on Time Magazine cover breastfeeding her nearly four-year-old son exemplifies how Attachment Moms are joining the LGBT "Out For Obama" campaign. Kathleen Sebelius expresses approval of Jamie Lynne Grumet enlisting the consent of her nearly four-year-old son to illustrate the importance of the Nanny State (a.k.a., the Ninny State) in the Life of Julia as a Mom who (unlike Mitt Romney's wife) cannot afford a Nanny. Says Sebelius, "Mitt-Romney's-Wife never had to choose between responsible motherhood and exploitation of her children, so she can't possibly understand the difference nor can she understand why, in the Life of Julia, the former must always necessarily trump the latter."  

            According Axelrod and Plouff, "Exploitation of children is no different from exploitation of any other group classifiable as a dependency group -- Why do you think society has always grouped 'women and children' together? It's because true progressives recognize that we can best serve both groups by recognizing them as having exceptionally strong needs of dependency unlike those barbaric 'Grizzly Moms,' who utterly refuse to exhibit dependency characterists because they are the polar opposite of 'Julia.'"
            Jim Carney issued a statement that "President Obama agrees that it's best for all groups to be viewed as dependency groups-- otherwise, how can we achieve our de-facto goal of changing the interpretation of the Bill of Rights from that of 'saying what Government can't do to you into saying what Goverment must do for you.' This is the glue that binds our dependency groups (women, blacks, latinos, children, Beta-Males, union members, etc.) together into 'Solidarity Forever.'"
Reporters asked Carney whether the "Out For Obama" breastfeeding campaign should include allowing the breastfeedor to permit the breastfeedee to also enjoy Oreos during breastfeeding. Carney replied that he would need to check with Michelle Obama before answering that question.
An insightful reporter with Media Matters asked whether these issues could be affected by how the Supreme Court rules on ObamaCare. Carney indicated that having anticipated that someone would ask that question, he had already obtained authority to quote Vice President Biden: "If the Supreme Court were to declare Obamcare unconstitutional, it would directly threaten the 'Attachment Motherhood' provision allowing mothers to breastfeed their children until age 26."
            Carney added, "One of the reasons we're confident that the Supreme Court won't declare ObamaCare unconstitutional is that it would jeopardize our ability to improve nutrition for children (and adults) by subsidizing "Drive Thru' Breastfeeding" as a healthy alternative to other forms of 'Fast Food.' That program (to be titled, 'Operation Disgourgement') would provide a rapid expansion of employment opportunities for young women since it's long been known that even childless women can lactate. Indeed, Axelrod and Plouff are confident that the prospect for such program would quickly reverse the temporary likely-voter advantage that Romney holds among men that is similar to the likely-voter advantage that President Obama enjoys among young women in general and unmarried women in particular."

--Jim Wrenn, Editor at PoliSat.Com.

Permanent links to this installment: 

http://PoliSat.Com/Attachment-Motherhood_Out-For-Obama.htm .

..

..

··

··

··

··

··

..

.

end.