·
|
|
· |
To counter the Tea-Party Movement, Progressives conclude it behooves 'em to gather and meet for coffee, not tea, to further progressivist movements.·
By Jim
Wrenn,
Editor and Washington Bureau Drawer Chief at PoliSat.Com.
March 6, 2010--
To counter the Tea-Party Movement, Progressives conclude it behooves 'em to gather and meet for coffee, not tea, to further progressivist movements. They think that the Tea-Party Movement misjudged what would best have behooved 'em 'cause coffee, not tea, best fosters the need to answer the call for a movement.
So therefore, Progressives have started the launch of a new "Coffee
Party," so movements like theirs are found everywhere when coffee is drunk
at their parties. In contrast, the Tea-Party thinks such new
Coffee-Party will link the public's perception of coffee confections as spawning
a movement that stinks.
Yet Tea-Party folks aren't perceived as drinkers of latte or tea, but like independents, their hot-beverage preference is coffee that's strong, 'stead of tea. Progressives more likely than not in choosing a beverage that's hot drink latte or tea, not coffee from beans, which doubles this paradox crop.
"So how can this paradox be removed?" asks the Party of Tea. A "how" is not needed, but why ain't it needed? 'Cause through it most people can see.
A new "Coffee Party" official, who knows it to be interstitial 'twixt "social" and "istic" has asked, "Can we fix it to not be perceived interstitial?" "We must be covert to succeed to make independents believe that we are like them with vigor and vim supporters of liberty's creed."
Covertness of course needs a name for winning covertly the game-- a name that
avoids subliminal voids opponents can fill with the name. The name
"Coffee Party" is not immune from subliminal plots against it by those
intent to expose facades we erect for our plots. An acronym-coiner explains the new Coffee Party's
real name ain't "Party of Java" or yada or yada-- It's really "C.P.U.S.A."
The acronym-coiner's a booster of Cubists prohibiting "losers" at the Peoples' Cube dot-Com which includes a writer by name of "Red Rooster." "Our new Coffee-Party's a movement. It's nom de plume name for our movement has drawbacks" said Rooster "'cause Tea-Party boosters can mock it as coffee-spawned 'movement.'" "You ask what I mean," added Rooster, who then quoted Tea-Party boosters in ads that proclaim "C.P.U.S.A. yields movements like coffee-caused movements."
We'd thought that the Party of Tea in smearing us wouldn't succeed; however,
says Rooster, the Tea Party boosters seem likely in this to succeed. And
tries by our media flakkers' to mock them with terms like "Tea-Baggers,"
have failed 'cause they've turned the use of such term from smear to a
young-male attracter. So, what should we learn from these facts from watching our media
flaks? It's harder for flaks for us to attack the Tea Party people as
quacks. So therefore, we have to develop improvements of
ways to envelop our tactics behind facades we devise to keep our agenda
enveloped. However, maintaining facades is tougher these days than
it was when channels for news were three for one view sans radio, bloggers and
Fox. So therefore, our task must include regaining control of the news
like "localize" tools for radio rules, net-neutral and neuter Fox
News.
Perhaps as you're reading these lines you've noticed a rhythm and rhyme-- and if you prefer the format of verse, scroll-down for the stanzas and lines:
To
counter the Tea-Party Movement,
Progressives conclude it behooves 'em
to gather and meet
for coffee, not tea,
to further progressivist movements.
They
think that the Tea-Party Movement
misjudged what would best have behooved 'em
'cause coffee, not tea,
best fosters the need
to answer the call for a movement.
So
therefore, Progressives have started
the launch of a new "Coffee Party,"
so movements like theirs
are found everywhere
when coffee is drunk at their parties.
In
contrast, the Tea-Party thinks
such new Coffee-Party will link
the public's perception
of coffee confections
as spawning a movement that stinks.
Yet
Tea-Party folks aren't perceived
as drinkers of latte or tea,
but like independents,
their hot-beverage preference
is coffee that's strong, 'stead of tea.
Progressives
more likely than not
in choosing a beverage that's hot
drink latte or tea,
"So
how can this paradox be
removed?" asks the Party of Tea.
A "how" is not needed,
but why ain't it needed?
'Cause through it most people can see.
A
new "Coffee Party" official,
who knows it to be interstitial
'twixt "social" and "istic"
has asked, "Can we fix it
to not be perceived interstitial?"
"We
must be covert to succeed
to make independents believe
that we are like them
with vigor and vim
supporters of liberty's creed."
Covertness
of course needs a name
for winning covertly the game--
a name that avoids
subliminal voids
opponents can fill with the name.
The
name "Coffee Party" is not
immune from subliminal plots
against it by those
intent to expose
facades we erect for our plots.
An
acronym-coiner explains
the new Coffee Party's real name
ain't "Party of Java"
or yada or yada--
It's really "C.P.U.S.A."
The
acronym-coiner's a booster
of Cubists prohibiting "losers"
at the Peoples' Cube dot-Com,
which includes
a writer by name of "Red Rooster."
"Our
new Coffee-Party's a movement.
It's nom de plume name for our movement
has drawbacks" said Rooster
"'cause Tea-Party boosters
can mock it as coffee-spawned 'movement.'"
"You
ask what I mean," added Rooster,
who then quoted Tea-Party boosters
in ads that proclaim
"C.P.U.S.A.
yields movements like coffee-caused movements."
We'd
thought that the Party of Tea
in smearing us wouldn't succeed;
however, says Rooster,
the Tea Party boosters
seem likely in this to succeed.
And
tries by our media flakkers'
to mock them with terms like "Tea-Baggers,"
have failed 'cause they've turned
the use of such term
from smear to a young-male attracter.
So,
what should we learn from these facts
from watching our media flaks?
It's harder for flaks
for us to attack
the Tea Party people as quacks.
So
therefore, we have to develop
improvements of ways to envelop
our tactics behind
facades we devise
to keep our agenda enveloped.
However,
maintaining facades
is tougher these days than it was
when channels for news were
So
therefore, our task must include
regaining control of the news
like "localize" tools
for radio rules,
net-neutral and neuter Fox News.
--Jim Wrenn, Editor at PoliSat.Com.
Permanent links to this installment:
OR
htto://PoliSat.Com/Coffee_Party_USA.htm
OR
http://polisat.com/DailyPoliticalSatire-Commentary/Archives2010/du20y10m03d06-01.htm
|
|
· |
end.